Thursday, July 24, 2008

"This is our moment. This our time."

I was going to do a post on the various dissembling and prevaracating the McCain campaign has been involved in over the "Surge" recently. But instead, I think I will take some time to talk about Mr. Obama's remarks.

It is often said that Senator Obama is a fine orator, but rarely have I seen an individual rise to the occasion so often when the expectations are set so impossibly high. His gift for delivery and the top notch writing of his team only further showcases this. If you subscribe to the conventional political wisdom, this trip and speech were ripe with potential pitfalls for the Obama campaign generally and Senator Obama specifically. Whether it was how he would be received by foreign dignitaries, to the presumptuousness of the whole venture, and even to the growing meme of his utter arrogance. He needed to thread the needle, as it were.

In a world that has increasingly come to loathe the United States, he must quell those fears without seeming to echo them. He must strike all the proper patriotic tones, without alienating his hosts, yet make it relevant and topical to all that might listen.

A tall order in deed.

How could he possibly convey all that, to all those people?

Well, by brandishing both his and Americas more potent message. Hope.

He went before the people of Germany and proclaimed, "Tomorrow will be better." But don't take my word for it, this passage sums up that feeling:

I know my country has not perfected itself. At times, we've struggled to keep the promise of liberty and equality for all of our people. We've made our share of mistakes, and there are times when our actions around the world have not lived up to our best intentions.

But I also know how much I love America. I know that for more than two centuries, we have strived - at great cost and great sacrifice - to form a more perfect union; to seek, with other nations, a more hopeful world. Our allegiance has never been to any particular tribe or kingdom - indeed, every language is spoken in our country; every culture has left its imprint on ours; every point of view is expressed in our public squares. What has always united us - what has always driven our people; what drew my father to America's shores - is a set of ideals that speak to aspirations shared by all people: that we can live free from fear and free from want; that we can speak our minds and assemble with whomever we choose and worship as we please.
These days are not those days. So whether you agree with the politics of the speaker or not, whether you are a supporter or not. It is the proper sentiment. We can acknowledge that we have made mistakes. It is not a statement on what we have to fear, but of why we should have hope. It wasn't a speech about those who wish us harm, but one about how we can help each other. It was a reminder of what we can be, because at its root at its core America is essentially built on hope.

That should be a message we all can appreciate.



-Cheers

-edit-added a link to the Senator's speech.

9 comments:

Brad said...

Did he already start campaigning for the Secretary-General of the United Nations in 2011? Now that confidence.

RomanX said...

Heh, I think it speaks to more of a yearning by the American people not to be reviled.....

Amy said...

It is a beautifully written speech but not all nations appreciate this type of talk. It is a common mistake of speechwriters to assume our level of compassion translates well over seas, when it is often seen as a sign of weakness, at best, or a sign of condescension and overbearingness. I am not saying I agree with those nations but I am saying that it is a very fine line between saying I love America and saying you should be like us. Our freedoms are exactly what certain nations dislike about us. Our culture is an abhorrent swampland to the more religious and strict cultures and peoples of the world. Those people have just as much reason and intelligence as we do and they choose to live the life they live.

RomanX said...

Actually that is one of the biggest canards out there. That is something a super villain would say. Very few places hate our"freedoms". What is disliked is our policy choices. Rightly or wrongly every principality is self-interested and any state outside of them is necessarily adversarial. Most places don't know what our freedoms are. Hell we don't know what are freedoms are....

Amy said...

Villainy is a way of life for me but that aside, I completely disagree. First of all, the Bill of Rights might be a good place to start if one has forgotten what their freedoms are. Our policy choices probably don’t mean a hill of beans to the average Muslim person, for example. Our way of life makes absolutely no sense to these people. Their entire way of life is dictated by their religion and their religion’s quest is to establish a government to uphold and promote their beliefs. I could go on with other examples but my point here is there are many groups of people in the world who feel our freedoms and excesses damn us to an eternity in hell. The consistent condescension of certain people blaming policy and not blaming a complete lack of respect for other cultures is causing the problem.

RomanX said...

Well there is a distinct difference between cultural differences and policy choices. It is disengenious to state that our problems in the middle east are related to the "Bill of Right". By and large people don't give a damn what you do in your own country...it's what you do with regards to them. I am not arguing that they don't have repressive governments over there...but there dislike has way more to do with our unwavering support of Israel, then Article IV. They "they hate our freedoms", is used as a way to further divide groups. To say, "this is us...and that is them". "Them" and "They" are always bad and we are always "good". No matter who the "we" are that is how they view themselves.

The average person around the world could give a damn actually. They just don't care. It is leaders who try to highlight differences and demonize "other" cultures to foment that antagonism to solidify a sense of nationality.

Amy said...

Where exactly did I state our problems with the Middle East are related to the Bill of Rights? I was suggesting that if an American had forgotten their rights, that would be a good place to look. Also, I think you just made my point about the context of the speech. In fact, you made it better than I did, so thank you. As far as Israel goes, there isn't much choice there. We made that bed a long, long time ago and have to sleep in it. They have a top notch military too and I, for one, wouldn't want to piss them off.

Don't get me wrong here... I fully support the candidacy of Senator Obama. I'm not saying I'll be voting for him, (because I have yet to make up my mind) but he has at the very least had an interesting effect on Washington and the ultra liberal media. I really appreciate the lack of Hilary Clinton as well, for however long it lasts.

RomanX said...

The "ultra" liberal media? After the last 8 years, I am shocked anyone could say that with a straight face. At some point I will launch in to a massive diatribe on the difference between the modern conservative movement (not to be confused with classical conservatism/libertarianism) vs liberal philosophy.

Amy said...

Ok, so ultra liberal may have been a bit of a stretch... but I've never claimed to have a straight face. =)